hgbook

annotate fr/ch05-daily.xml @ 977:719b03ea27c8

merge with Italian, and very (few) work on ch03
author Romain PELISSE <belaran@gmail.com>
date Fri Sep 04 16:33:46 2009 +0200 (2009-09-04)
parents
children 6f8c48362758
rev   line source
belaran@964 1 <!-- vim: set filetype=docbkxml shiftwidth=2 autoindent expandtab tw=77 : -->
belaran@964 2
belaran@964 3 <chapter>
belaran@964 4 <title>Mercurial in daily use</title>
belaran@964 5 <para>\label{chap:daily}</para>
belaran@964 6
belaran@964 7 <sect1>
belaran@964 8 <title>Telling Mercurial which files to track</title>
belaran@964 9
belaran@964 10 <para>Mercurial does not work with files in your repository unless you tell
belaran@964 11 it to manage them. The <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command> command will tell you which
belaran@964 12 files Mercurial doesn't know about; it uses a <quote><literal>?</literal></quote> to
belaran@964 13 display such files.</para>
belaran@964 14
belaran@964 15 <para>To tell Mercurial to track a file, use the <command role="hg-cmd">hg add</command> command. Once
belaran@964 16 you have added a file, the entry in the output of <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command> for
belaran@964 17 that file changes from <quote><literal>?</literal></quote> to <quote><literal>A</literal></quote>.
belaran@964 18 <!-- &interaction.daily.files.add; --></para>
belaran@964 19
belaran@964 20 <para>After you run a <command role="hg-cmd">hg commit</command>, the files that you added before the
belaran@964 21 commit will no longer be listed in the output of <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command>. The
belaran@964 22 reason for this is that <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command> only tells you about
belaran@964 23 <quote>interesting</quote> files&emdash;those that you have modified or told Mercurial
belaran@964 24 to do something with&emdash;by default. If you have a repository that
belaran@964 25 contains thousands of files, you will rarely want to know about files
belaran@964 26 that Mercurial is tracking, but that have not changed. (You can still
belaran@964 27 get this information; we'll return to this later.)</para>
belaran@964 28
belaran@964 29 <para>Once you add a file, Mercurial doesn't do anything with it
belaran@964 30 immediately. Instead, it will take a snapshot of the file's state the
belaran@964 31 next time you perform a commit. It will then continue to track the
belaran@964 32 changes you make to the file every time you commit, until you remove
belaran@964 33 the file.</para>
belaran@964 34
belaran@964 35 <sect2>
belaran@964 36 <title>Explicit versus implicit file naming</title>
belaran@964 37
belaran@964 38 <para>A useful behaviour that Mercurial has is that if you pass the name of
belaran@964 39 a directory to a command, every Mercurial command will treat this as
belaran@964 40 <quote>I want to operate on every file in this directory and its
belaran@964 41 subdirectories</quote>.
belaran@964 42 <!-- &interaction.daily.files.add-dir; -->
belaran@964 43 Notice in this example that Mercurial printed the names of the files
belaran@964 44 it added, whereas it didn't do so when we added the file named
belaran@964 45 <filename>a</filename> in the earlier example.</para>
belaran@964 46
belaran@964 47 <para>What's going on is that in the former case, we explicitly named the
belaran@964 48 file to add on the command line, so the assumption that Mercurial
belaran@964 49 makes in such cases is that you know what you were doing, and it
belaran@964 50 doesn't print any output.</para>
belaran@964 51
belaran@964 52 <para>However, when we <emphasis>imply</emphasis> the names of files by giving the name of
belaran@964 53 a directory, Mercurial takes the extra step of printing the name of
belaran@964 54 each file that it does something with. This makes it more clear what
belaran@964 55 is happening, and reduces the likelihood of a silent and nasty
belaran@964 56 surprise. This behaviour is common to most Mercurial commands.</para>
belaran@964 57
belaran@964 58 </sect2>
belaran@964 59 <sect2>
belaran@964 60 <title>Aside: Mercurial tracks files, not directories</title>
belaran@964 61
belaran@964 62 <para>Mercurial does not track directory information. Instead, it tracks
belaran@964 63 the path to a file. Before creating a file, it first creates any
belaran@964 64 missing directory components of the path. After it deletes a file, it
belaran@964 65 then deletes any empty directories that were in the deleted file's
belaran@964 66 path. This sounds like a trivial distinction, but it has one minor
belaran@964 67 practical consequence: it is not possible to represent a completely
belaran@964 68 empty directory in Mercurial.
belaran@964 69 </para>
belaran@964 70
belaran@964 71 <para>Empty directories are rarely useful, and there are unintrusive
belaran@964 72 workarounds that you can use to achieve an appropriate effect. The
belaran@964 73 developers of Mercurial thus felt that the complexity that would be
belaran@964 74 required to manage empty directories was not worth the limited benefit
belaran@964 75 this feature would bring.
belaran@964 76 </para>
belaran@964 77
belaran@964 78 <para>If you need an empty directory in your repository, there are a few
belaran@964 79 ways to achieve this. One is to create a directory, then <command role="hg-cmd">hg add</command> a
belaran@964 80 <quote>hidden</quote> file to that directory. On Unix-like systems, any file
belaran@964 81 name that begins with a period (<quote><literal>.</literal></quote>) is treated as hidden
belaran@964 82 by most commands and GUI tools. This approach is illustrated in
belaran@964 83 figure <xref linkend="ex:daily:hidden"/>.
belaran@964 84 </para>
belaran@964 85
belaran@964 86 <informalfigure>
belaran@964 87 <para> <!-- &interaction.daily.files.hidden; -->
belaran@964 88 <caption><para>Simulating an empty directory using a hidden file</para></caption>
belaran@964 89 \label{ex:daily:hidden}
belaran@964 90 </para>
belaran@964 91 </informalfigure>
belaran@964 92
belaran@964 93 <para>Another way to tackle a need for an empty directory is to simply
belaran@964 94 create one in your automated build scripts before they will need it.
belaran@964 95 </para>
belaran@964 96
belaran@964 97 </sect2>
belaran@964 98 </sect1>
belaran@964 99 <sect1>
belaran@964 100 <title>How to stop tracking a file</title>
belaran@964 101
belaran@964 102 <para>Once you decide that a file no longer belongs in your repository, use
belaran@964 103 the <command role="hg-cmd">hg remove</command> command; this deletes the file, and tells Mercurial
belaran@964 104 to stop tracking it. A removed file is represented in the output of
belaran@964 105 <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command> with a <quote><literal>R</literal></quote>.
belaran@964 106 <!-- &interaction.daily.files.remove; -->
belaran@964 107 </para>
belaran@964 108
belaran@964 109 <para>After you <command role="hg-cmd">hg remove</command> a file, Mercurial will no longer track
belaran@964 110 changes to that file, even if you recreate a file with the same name
belaran@964 111 in your working directory. If you do recreate a file with the same
belaran@964 112 name and want Mercurial to track the new file, simply <command role="hg-cmd">hg add</command> it.
belaran@964 113 Mercurial will know that the newly added file is not related to the
belaran@964 114 old file of the same name.
belaran@964 115 </para>
belaran@964 116
belaran@964 117 <sect2>
belaran@964 118 <title>Removing a file does not affect its history</title>
belaran@964 119
belaran@964 120 <para>It is important to understand that removing a file has only two
belaran@964 121 effects.
belaran@964 122 </para>
belaran@964 123 <itemizedlist>
belaran@964 124 <listitem><para>It removes the current version of the file from the working
belaran@964 125 directory.
belaran@964 126 </para>
belaran@964 127 </listitem>
belaran@964 128 <listitem><para>It stops Mercurial from tracking changes to the file, from the
belaran@964 129 time of the next commit.
belaran@964 130 </para>
belaran@964 131 </listitem></itemizedlist>
belaran@964 132 <para>Removing a file <emphasis>does not</emphasis> in any way alter the <emphasis>history</emphasis> of
belaran@964 133 the file.
belaran@964 134 </para>
belaran@964 135
belaran@964 136 <para>If you update the working directory to a changeset in which a file
belaran@964 137 that you have removed was still tracked, it will reappear in the
belaran@964 138 working directory, with the contents it had when you committed that
belaran@964 139 changeset. If you then update the working directory to a later
belaran@964 140 changeset, in which the file had been removed, Mercurial will once
belaran@964 141 again remove the file from the working directory.
belaran@964 142 </para>
belaran@964 143
belaran@964 144 </sect2>
belaran@964 145 <sect2>
belaran@964 146 <title>Missing files</title>
belaran@964 147
belaran@964 148 <para>Mercurial considers a file that you have deleted, but not used
belaran@964 149 <command role="hg-cmd">hg remove</command> to delete, to be <emphasis>missing</emphasis>. A missing file is
belaran@964 150 represented with <quote><literal>!</literal></quote> in the output of <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command>.
belaran@964 151 Mercurial commands will not generally do anything with missing files.
belaran@964 152 <!-- &interaction.daily.files.missing; -->
belaran@964 153 </para>
belaran@964 154
belaran@964 155 <para>If your repository contains a file that <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command> reports as
belaran@964 156 missing, and you want the file to stay gone, you can run
belaran@964 157 <command role="hg-cmd">hg remove <option role="hg-opt-remove">--after</option></command> at any time later on, to
belaran@964 158 tell Mercurial that you really did mean to remove the file.
belaran@964 159 <!-- &interaction.daily.files.remove-after; -->
belaran@964 160 </para>
belaran@964 161
belaran@964 162 <para>On the other hand, if you deleted the missing file by accident, use
belaran@964 163 <command role="hg-cmd">hg revert <emphasis>filename</emphasis></command> to recover the file. It will
belaran@964 164 reappear, in unmodified form.
belaran@964 165 <!-- &interaction.daily.files.recover-missing; -->
belaran@964 166 </para>
belaran@964 167
belaran@964 168 <para>\subsection{Aside: why tell Mercurial explicitly to
belaran@964 169 remove a file?}
belaran@964 170 </para>
belaran@964 171
belaran@964 172 <para>You might wonder why Mercurial requires you to explicitly tell it that
belaran@964 173 you are deleting a file. Early during the development of Mercurial,
belaran@964 174 it let you delete a file however you pleased; Mercurial would notice
belaran@964 175 the absence of the file automatically when you next ran a
belaran@964 176 <command role="hg-cmd">hg commit</command>, and stop tracking the file. In practice, this made it
belaran@964 177 too easy to accidentally remove a file without noticing.
belaran@964 178 </para>
belaran@964 179
belaran@964 180 <para>\subsection{Useful shorthand&emdash;adding and removing files
belaran@964 181 in one step}
belaran@964 182 </para>
belaran@964 183
belaran@964 184 <para>Mercurial offers a combination command, <command role="hg-cmd">hg addremove</command>, that adds
belaran@964 185 untracked files and marks missing files as removed.
belaran@964 186 <!-- &interaction.daily.files.addremove; -->
belaran@964 187 The <command role="hg-cmd">hg commit</command> command also provides a <option role="hg-opt-commit">-A</option> option
belaran@964 188 that performs this same add-and-remove, immediately followed by a
belaran@964 189 commit.
belaran@964 190 <!-- &interaction.daily.files.commit-addremove; -->
belaran@964 191 </para>
belaran@964 192
belaran@964 193 </sect2>
belaran@964 194 </sect1>
belaran@964 195 <sect1>
belaran@964 196 <title>Copying files</title>
belaran@964 197
belaran@964 198 <para>Mercurial provides a <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> command that lets you make a new
belaran@964 199 copy of a file. When you copy a file using this command, Mercurial
belaran@964 200 makes a record of the fact that the new file is a copy of the original
belaran@964 201 file. It treats these copied files specially when you merge your work
belaran@964 202 with someone else's.
belaran@964 203 </para>
belaran@964 204
belaran@964 205 <sect2>
belaran@964 206 <title>The results of copying during a merge</title>
belaran@964 207
belaran@964 208 <para>What happens during a merge is that changes <quote>follow</quote> a copy. To
belaran@964 209 best illustrate what this means, let's create an example. We'll start
belaran@964 210 with the usual tiny repository that contains a single file.
belaran@964 211 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.init; -->
belaran@964 212 We need to do some work in parallel, so that we'll have something to
belaran@964 213 merge. So let's clone our repository.
belaran@964 214 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.clone; -->
belaran@964 215 Back in our initial repository, let's use the <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> command to
belaran@964 216 make a copy of the first file we created.
belaran@964 217 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.copy; -->
belaran@964 218 </para>
belaran@964 219
belaran@964 220 <para>If we look at the output of the <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command> command afterwards, the
belaran@964 221 copied file looks just like a normal added file.
belaran@964 222 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.status; -->
belaran@964 223 But if we pass the <option role="hg-opt-status">-C</option> option to <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command>, it
belaran@964 224 prints another line of output: this is the file that our newly-added
belaran@964 225 file was copied <emphasis>from</emphasis>.
belaran@964 226 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.status-copy; -->
belaran@964 227 </para>
belaran@964 228
belaran@964 229 <para>Now, back in the repository we cloned, let's make a change in
belaran@964 230 parallel. We'll add a line of content to the original file that we
belaran@964 231 created.
belaran@964 232 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.other; -->
belaran@964 233 Now we have a modified <filename>file</filename> in this repository. When we
belaran@964 234 pull the changes from the first repository, and merge the two heads,
belaran@964 235 Mercurial will propagate the changes that we made locally to
belaran@964 236 <filename>file</filename> into its copy, <filename>new-file</filename>.
belaran@964 237 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.merge; -->
belaran@964 238 </para>
belaran@964 239
belaran@964 240 </sect2>
belaran@964 241 <sect2>
belaran@964 242 <title>Why should changes follow copies?</title>
belaran@964 243 <para>\label{sec:daily:why-copy}
belaran@964 244 </para>
belaran@964 245
belaran@964 246 <para>This behaviour, of changes to a file propagating out to copies of the
belaran@964 247 file, might seem esoteric, but in most cases it's highly desirable.
belaran@964 248 </para>
belaran@964 249
belaran@964 250 <para>First of all, remember that this propagation <emphasis>only</emphasis> happens when
belaran@964 251 you merge. So if you <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> a file, and subsequently modify the
belaran@964 252 original file during the normal course of your work, nothing will
belaran@964 253 happen.
belaran@964 254 </para>
belaran@964 255
belaran@964 256 <para>The second thing to know is that modifications will only propagate
belaran@964 257 across a copy as long as the repository that you're pulling changes
belaran@964 258 from <emphasis>doesn't know</emphasis> about the copy.
belaran@964 259 </para>
belaran@964 260
belaran@964 261 <para>The reason that Mercurial does this is as follows. Let's say I make
belaran@964 262 an important bug fix in a source file, and commit my changes.
belaran@964 263 Meanwhile, you've decided to <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> the file in your repository,
belaran@964 264 without knowing about the bug or having seen the fix, and you have
belaran@964 265 started hacking on your copy of the file.
belaran@964 266 </para>
belaran@964 267
belaran@964 268 <para>If you pulled and merged my changes, and Mercurial <emphasis>didn't</emphasis>
belaran@964 269 propagate changes across copies, your source file would now contain
belaran@964 270 the bug, and unless you remembered to propagate the bug fix by hand,
belaran@964 271 the bug would <emphasis>remain</emphasis> in your copy of the file.
belaran@964 272 </para>
belaran@964 273
belaran@964 274 <para>By automatically propagating the change that fixed the bug from the
belaran@964 275 original file to the copy, Mercurial prevents this class of problem.
belaran@964 276 To my knowledge, Mercurial is the <emphasis>only</emphasis> revision control system
belaran@964 277 that propagates changes across copies like this.
belaran@964 278 </para>
belaran@964 279
belaran@964 280 <para>Once your change history has a record that the copy and subsequent
belaran@964 281 merge occurred, there's usually no further need to propagate changes
belaran@964 282 from the original file to the copied file, and that's why Mercurial
belaran@964 283 only propagates changes across copies until this point, and no
belaran@964 284 further.
belaran@964 285 </para>
belaran@964 286
belaran@964 287 </sect2>
belaran@964 288 <sect2>
belaran@964 289 <title>How to make changes <emphasis>not</emphasis> follow a copy</title>
belaran@964 290
belaran@964 291 <para>If, for some reason, you decide that this business of automatically
belaran@964 292 propagating changes across copies is not for you, simply use your
belaran@964 293 system's normal file copy command (on Unix-like systems, that's
belaran@964 294 <command>cp</command>) to make a copy of a file, then <command role="hg-cmd">hg add</command> the new copy
belaran@964 295 by hand. Before you do so, though, please do reread
belaran@964 296 section <xref linkend="sec:daily:why-copy"/>, and make an informed decision that
belaran@964 297 this behaviour is not appropriate to your specific case.
belaran@964 298 </para>
belaran@964 299
belaran@964 300 </sect2>
belaran@964 301 <sect2>
belaran@964 302 <title>Behaviour of the <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> command</title>
belaran@964 303
belaran@964 304 <para>When you use the <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> command, Mercurial makes a copy of each
belaran@964 305 source file as it currently stands in the working directory. This
belaran@964 306 means that if you make some modifications to a file, then <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command>
belaran@964 307 it without first having committed those changes, the new copy will
belaran@964 308 also contain the modifications you have made up until that point. (I
belaran@964 309 find this behaviour a little counterintuitive, which is why I mention
belaran@964 310 it here.)
belaran@964 311 </para>
belaran@964 312
belaran@964 313 <para>The <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> command acts similarly to the Unix <command>cp</command>
belaran@964 314 command (you can use the <command role="hg-cmd">hg cp</command> alias if you prefer). The last
belaran@964 315 argument is the <emphasis>destination</emphasis>, and all prior arguments are
belaran@964 316 <emphasis>sources</emphasis>. If you pass it a single file as the source, and the
belaran@964 317 destination does not exist, it creates a new file with that name.
belaran@964 318 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.simple; -->
belaran@964 319 If the destination is a directory, Mercurial copies its sources into
belaran@964 320 that directory.
belaran@964 321 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.dir-dest; -->
belaran@964 322 Copying a directory is recursive, and preserves the directory
belaran@964 323 structure of the source.
belaran@964 324 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.dir-src; -->
belaran@964 325 If the source and destination are both directories, the source tree is
belaran@964 326 recreated in the destination directory.
belaran@964 327 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.dir-src-dest; -->
belaran@964 328 </para>
belaran@964 329
belaran@964 330 <para>As with the <command role="hg-cmd">hg rename</command> command, if you copy a file manually and
belaran@964 331 then want Mercurial to know that you've copied the file, simply use
belaran@964 332 the <option role="hg-opt-copy">--after</option> option to <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command>.
belaran@964 333 <!-- &interaction.daily.copy.after; -->
belaran@964 334 </para>
belaran@964 335
belaran@964 336 </sect2>
belaran@964 337 </sect1>
belaran@964 338 <sect1>
belaran@964 339 <title>Renaming files</title>
belaran@964 340
belaran@964 341 <para>It's rather more common to need to rename a file than to make a copy
belaran@964 342 of it. The reason I discussed the <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> command before talking
belaran@964 343 about renaming files is that Mercurial treats a rename in essentially
belaran@964 344 the same way as a copy. Therefore, knowing what Mercurial does when
belaran@964 345 you copy a file tells you what to expect when you rename a file.
belaran@964 346 </para>
belaran@964 347
belaran@964 348 <para>When you use the <command role="hg-cmd">hg rename</command> command, Mercurial makes a copy of
belaran@964 349 each source file, then deletes it and marks the file as removed.
belaran@964 350 <!-- &interaction.daily.rename.rename; -->
belaran@964 351 The <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command> command shows the newly copied file as added, and
belaran@964 352 the copied-from file as removed.
belaran@964 353 <!-- &interaction.daily.rename.status; -->
belaran@964 354 As with the results of a <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command>, we must use the
belaran@964 355 <option role="hg-opt-status">-C</option> option to <command role="hg-cmd">hg status</command> to see that the added file
belaran@964 356 is really being tracked by Mercurial as a copy of the original, now
belaran@964 357 removed, file.
belaran@964 358 <!-- &interaction.daily.rename.status-copy; -->
belaran@964 359 </para>
belaran@964 360
belaran@964 361 <para>As with <command role="hg-cmd">hg remove</command> and <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command>, you can tell Mercurial about
belaran@964 362 a rename after the fact using the <option role="hg-opt-rename">--after</option> option. In
belaran@964 363 most other respects, the behaviour of the <command role="hg-cmd">hg rename</command> command, and
belaran@964 364 the options it accepts, are similar to the <command role="hg-cmd">hg copy</command> command.
belaran@964 365 </para>
belaran@964 366
belaran@964 367 <sect2>
belaran@964 368 <title>Renaming files and merging changes</title>
belaran@964 369
belaran@964 370 <para>Since Mercurial's rename is implemented as copy-and-remove, the same
belaran@964 371 propagation of changes happens when you merge after a rename as after
belaran@964 372 a copy.
belaran@964 373 </para>
belaran@964 374
belaran@964 375 <para>If I modify a file, and you rename it to a new name, and then we merge
belaran@964 376 our respective changes, my modifications to the file under its
belaran@964 377 original name will be propagated into the file under its new name.
belaran@964 378 (This is something you might expect to <quote>simply work,</quote> but not all
belaran@964 379 revision control systems actually do this.)
belaran@964 380 </para>
belaran@964 381
belaran@964 382 <para>Whereas having changes follow a copy is a feature where you can
belaran@964 383 perhaps nod and say <quote>yes, that might be useful,</quote> it should be clear
belaran@964 384 that having them follow a rename is definitely important. Without
belaran@964 385 this facility, it would simply be too easy for changes to become
belaran@964 386 orphaned when files are renamed.
belaran@964 387 </para>
belaran@964 388
belaran@964 389 </sect2>
belaran@964 390 <sect2>
belaran@964 391 <title>Divergent renames and merging</title>
belaran@964 392
belaran@964 393 <para>The case of diverging names occurs when two developers start with a
belaran@964 394 file&emdash;let's call it <filename>foo</filename>&emdash;in their respective
belaran@964 395 repositories.
belaran@964 396 </para>
belaran@964 397
belaran@964 398 <para><!-- &interaction.rename.divergent.clone; -->
belaran@964 399 Anne renames the file to <filename>bar</filename>.
belaran@964 400 <!-- &interaction.rename.divergent.rename.anne; -->
belaran@964 401 Meanwhile, Bob renames it to <filename>quux</filename>.
belaran@964 402 <!-- &interaction.rename.divergent.rename.bob; -->
belaran@964 403 </para>
belaran@964 404
belaran@964 405 <para>I like to think of this as a conflict because each developer has
belaran@964 406 expressed different intentions about what the file ought to be named.
belaran@964 407 </para>
belaran@964 408
belaran@964 409 <para>What do you think should happen when they merge their work?
belaran@964 410 Mercurial's actual behaviour is that it always preserves <emphasis>both</emphasis>
belaran@964 411 names when it merges changesets that contain divergent renames.
belaran@964 412 <!-- &interaction.rename.divergent.merge; -->
belaran@964 413 </para>
belaran@964 414
belaran@964 415 <para>Notice that Mercurial does warn about the divergent renames, but it
belaran@964 416 leaves it up to you to do something about the divergence after the merge.
belaran@964 417 </para>
belaran@964 418
belaran@964 419 </sect2>
belaran@964 420 <sect2>
belaran@964 421 <title>Convergent renames and merging</title>
belaran@964 422
belaran@964 423 <para>Another kind of rename conflict occurs when two people choose to
belaran@964 424 rename different <emphasis>source</emphasis> files to the same <emphasis>destination</emphasis>.
belaran@964 425 In this case, Mercurial runs its normal merge machinery, and lets you
belaran@964 426 guide it to a suitable resolution.
belaran@964 427 </para>
belaran@964 428
belaran@964 429 </sect2>
belaran@964 430 <sect2>
belaran@964 431 <title>Other name-related corner cases</title>
belaran@964 432
belaran@964 433 <para>Mercurial has a longstanding bug in which it fails to handle a merge
belaran@964 434 where one side has a file with a given name, while another has a
belaran@964 435 directory with the same name. This is documented as <ulink role="hg-bug" url="http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue29">issue 29</ulink>.
belaran@964 436 <!-- &interaction.issue29.go; -->
belaran@964 437 </para>
belaran@964 438
belaran@964 439 </sect2>
belaran@964 440 </sect1>
belaran@964 441 <sect1>
belaran@964 442 <title>Recovering from mistakes</title>
belaran@964 443
belaran@964 444 <para>Mercurial has some useful commands that will help you to recover from
belaran@964 445 some common mistakes.
belaran@964 446 </para>
belaran@964 447
belaran@964 448 <para>The <command role="hg-cmd">hg revert</command> command lets you undo changes that you have made to
belaran@964 449 your working directory. For example, if you <command role="hg-cmd">hg add</command> a file by
belaran@964 450 accident, just run <command role="hg-cmd">hg revert</command> with the name of the file you added,
belaran@964 451 and while the file won't be touched in any way, it won't be tracked
belaran@964 452 for adding by Mercurial any longer, either. You can also use
belaran@964 453 <command role="hg-cmd">hg revert</command> to get rid of erroneous changes to a file.
belaran@964 454 </para>
belaran@964 455
belaran@964 456 <para>It's useful to remember that the <command role="hg-cmd">hg revert</command> command is useful for
belaran@964 457 changes that you have not yet committed. Once you've committed a
belaran@964 458 change, if you decide it was a mistake, you can still do something
belaran@964 459 about it, though your options may be more limited.
belaran@964 460 </para>
belaran@964 461
belaran@964 462 <para>For more information about the <command role="hg-cmd">hg revert</command> command, and details
belaran@964 463 about how to deal with changes you have already committed, see
belaran@964 464 chapter <xref linkend="chap:undo"/>.
belaran@964 465 </para>
belaran@964 466
belaran@964 467 </sect1>
belaran@964 468 </chapter>
belaran@964 469
belaran@964 470 <!--
belaran@964 471 local variables:
belaran@964 472 sgml-parent-document: ("00book.xml" "book" "chapter")
belaran@964 473 end:
belaran@964 474 -->