hgbook

annotate en/tour-basic.tex @ 317:cd595464fea9

Added a source for Solaris Mercurial binaries
author Sean Russell <ser@ser1.net>
date Thu Aug 21 23:26:38 2008 -0400 (2008-08-21)
parents f8a2fe77908d
children 1d277d6aa187
rev   line source
bos@95 1 \chapter{A tour of Mercurial: the basics}
bos@95 2 \label{chap:tour-basic}
bos@84 3
bos@84 4 \section{Installing Mercurial on your system}
bos@84 5 \label{sec:tour:install}
bos@84 6
bos@85 7 Prebuilt binary packages of Mercurial are available for every popular
bos@85 8 operating system. These make it easy to start using Mercurial on your
bos@85 9 computer immediately.
bos@85 10
bos@84 11 \subsection{Linux}
bos@84 12
bos@84 13 Because each Linux distribution has its own packaging tools, policies,
bos@84 14 and rate of development, it's difficult to give a comprehensive set of
bos@85 15 instructions on how to install Mercurial binaries. The version of
bos@85 16 Mercurial that you will end up with can vary depending on how active
bos@85 17 the person is who maintains the package for your distribution.
bos@84 18
bos@84 19 To keep things simple, I will focus on installing Mercurial from the
bos@84 20 command line under the most popular Linux distributions. Most of
bos@84 21 these distributions provide graphical package managers that will let
bos@84 22 you install Mercurial with a single click; the package name to look
bos@84 23 for is \texttt{mercurial}.
bos@84 24
bos@85 25 \begin{itemize}
bos@85 26 \item[Debian]
bos@85 27 \begin{codesample4}
bos@85 28 apt-get install mercurial
bos@85 29 \end{codesample4}
bos@84 30
bos@85 31 \item[Fedora Core]
bos@85 32 \begin{codesample4}
bos@85 33 yum install mercurial
bos@85 34 \end{codesample4}
bos@84 35
bos@85 36 \item[Gentoo]
bos@85 37 \begin{codesample4}
bos@85 38 emerge mercurial
bos@85 39 \end{codesample4}
bos@84 40
bos@85 41 \item[OpenSUSE]
bos@85 42 \begin{codesample4}
bos@85 43 yum install mercurial
bos@85 44 \end{codesample4}
bos@84 45
bos@262 46 \item[Ubuntu] Ubuntu's Mercurial package is based on Debian's. To
bos@262 47 install it, run the following command.
bos@262 48 \begin{codesample4}
bos@262 49 apt-get install mercurial
bos@262 50 \end{codesample4}
bos@262 51 The Ubuntu package for Mercurial tends to lag behind the Debian
bos@262 52 version by a considerable time margin (at the time of writing, seven
bos@262 53 months), which in some cases will mean that on Ubuntu, you may run
bos@262 54 into problems that have since been fixed in the Debian package.
bos@85 55 \end{itemize}
bos@84 56
arne@264 57 \subsection{Solaris}
arne@264 58
ser@317 59 SunFreeWare, at \url{http://www.sunfreeware.com}, is a good source for a
ser@317 60 large number of pre-built Solaris packages for 32 and 64 bit Intel and
ser@317 61 Sparc architectures, including current versions of Mercurial.
arne@264 62
bos@84 63 \subsection{Mac OS X}
bos@84 64
bos@84 65 Lee Cantey publishes an installer of Mercurial for Mac OS~X at
bos@84 66 \url{http://mercurial.berkwood.com}. This package works on both
bos@85 67 Intel-~and Power-based Macs. Before you can use it, you must install
bos@85 68 a compatible version of Universal MacPython~\cite{web:macpython}. This
bos@85 69 is easy to do; simply follow the instructions on Lee's site.
bos@84 70
bos@84 71 \subsection{Windows}
bos@84 72
arne@264 73 Lee Cantey also publishes an installer of Mercurial for Windows at
bos@84 74 \url{http://mercurial.berkwood.com}. This package has no external
bos@84 75 dependencies; it ``just works''.
bos@84 76
bos@84 77 \begin{note}
bos@84 78 The Windows version of Mercurial does not automatically convert line
bos@84 79 endings between Windows and Unix styles. If you want to share work
bos@84 80 with Unix users, you must do a little additional configuration
bos@84 81 work. XXX Flesh this out.
bos@84 82 \end{note}
bos@84 83
bos@87 84 \section{Getting started}
bos@87 85
bos@87 86 To begin, we'll use the \hgcmd{version} command to find out whether
bos@87 87 Mercurial is actually installed properly. The actual version
bos@87 88 information that it prints isn't so important; it's whether it prints
bos@87 89 anything at all that we care about.
bos@87 90 \interaction{tour.version}
bos@87 91
bos@87 92 \subsection{Built-in help}
bos@87 93
steve@158 94 Mercurial provides a built-in help system. This is invaluable for those
bos@87 95 times when you find yourself stuck trying to remember how to run a
bos@87 96 command. If you are completely stuck, simply run \hgcmd{help}; it
bos@87 97 will print a brief list of commands, along with a description of what
bos@87 98 each does. If you ask for help on a specific command (as below), it
bos@87 99 prints more detailed information.
bos@87 100 \interaction{tour.help}
bos@87 101 For a more impressive level of detail (which you won't usually need)
bos@87 102 run \hgcmdargs{help}{\hggopt{-v}}. The \hggopt{-v} option is short
bos@87 103 for \hggopt{--verbose}, and tells Mercurial to print more information
bos@87 104 than it usually would.
bos@87 105
bos@87 106 \section{Working with a repository}
bos@87 107
bos@87 108 In Mercurial, everything happens inside a \emph{repository}. The
bos@87 109 repository for a project contains all of the files that ``belong to''
bos@87 110 that project, along with a historical record of the project's files.
bos@87 111
bos@87 112 There's nothing particularly magical about a repository; it is simply
bos@87 113 a directory tree in your filesystem that Mercurial treats as special.
steve@158 114 You can rename or delete a repository any time you like, using either the
bos@87 115 command line or your file browser.
bos@87 116
bos@88 117 \subsection{Making a local copy of a repository}
bos@87 118
bos@87 119 \emph{Copying} a repository is just a little bit special. While you
bos@87 120 could use a normal file copying command to make a copy of a
bos@87 121 repository, it's best to use a built-in command that Mercurial
bos@87 122 provides. This command is called \hgcmd{clone}, because it creates an
bos@87 123 identical copy of an existing repository.
bos@87 124 \interaction{tour.clone}
bos@87 125 If our clone succeeded, we should now have a local directory called
bos@87 126 \dirname{hello}. This directory will contain some files.
bos@87 127 \interaction{tour.ls}
bos@87 128 These files have the same contents and history in our repository as
bos@87 129 they do in the repository we cloned.
bos@87 130
bos@87 131 Every Mercurial repository is complete, self-contained, and
bos@87 132 independent. It contains its own private copy of a project's files
bos@87 133 and history. A cloned repository remembers the location of the
bos@87 134 repository it was cloned from, but it does not communicate with that
bos@87 135 repository, or any other, unless you tell it to.
bos@87 136
bos@87 137 What this means for now is that we're free to experiment with our
bos@87 138 repository, safe in the knowledge that it's a private ``sandbox'' that
bos@87 139 won't affect anyone else.
bos@85 140
bos@88 141 \subsection{What's in a repository?}
bos@88 142
bos@88 143 When we take a more detailed look inside a repository, we can see that
bos@88 144 it contains a directory named \dirname{.hg}. This is where Mercurial
bos@88 145 keeps all of its metadata for the repository.
bos@88 146 \interaction{tour.ls-a}
bos@88 147
bos@88 148 The contents of the \dirname{.hg} directory and its subdirectories are
bos@88 149 private to Mercurial. Every other file and directory in the
bos@88 150 repository is yours to do with as you please.
bos@88 151
bos@88 152 To introduce a little terminology, the \dirname{.hg} directory is the
bos@88 153 ``real'' repository, and all of the files and directories that coexist
bos@91 154 with it are said to live in the \emph{working directory}. An easy way
bos@91 155 to remember the distinction is that the \emph{repository} contains the
bos@88 156 \emph{history} of your project, while the \emph{working directory}
bos@88 157 contains a \emph{snapshot} of your project at a particular point in
bos@88 158 history.
bos@88 159
bos@88 160 \section{A tour through history}
bos@88 161
bos@88 162 One of the first things we might want to do with a new, unfamiliar
bos@88 163 repository is understand its history. The \hgcmd{log} command gives
bos@88 164 us a view of history.
bos@88 165 \interaction{tour.log}
bos@88 166 By default, this command prints a brief paragraph of output for each
bos@88 167 change to the project that was recorded. In Mercurial terminology, we
bos@88 168 call each of these recorded events a \emph{changeset}, because it can
bos@88 169 contain a record of changes to several files.
bos@88 170
bos@88 171 The fields in a record of output from \hgcmd{log} are as follows.
bos@88 172 \begin{itemize}
bos@88 173 \item[\texttt{changeset}] This field has the format of a number,
bos@88 174 followed by a colon, followed by a hexadecimal string. These are
bos@88 175 \emph{identifiers} for the changeset. There are two identifiers
bos@88 176 because the number is shorter and easier to type than the hex
bos@88 177 string.
bos@88 178 \item[\texttt{user}] The identity of the person who created the
bos@88 179 changeset. This is a free-form field, but it most often contains a
bos@88 180 person's name and email address.
bos@88 181 \item[\texttt{date}] The date and time on which the changeset was
steve@158 182 created, and the timezone in which it was created. (The date and
bos@88 183 time are local to that timezone; they display what time and date it
bos@88 184 was for the person who created the changeset.)
bos@88 185 \item[\texttt{summary}] The first line of the text message that the
bos@88 186 creator of the changeset entered to describe the changeset.
bos@88 187 \end{itemize}
bos@88 188 The default output printed by \hgcmd{log} is purely a summary; it is
bos@88 189 missing a lot of detail.
bos@88 190
bos@99 191 Figure~\ref{fig:tour-basic:history} provides a graphical representation of
bos@97 192 the history of the \dirname{hello} repository, to make it a little
bos@97 193 easier to see which direction history is ``flowing'' in. We'll be
bos@97 194 returning to this figure several times in this chapter and the chapter
bos@97 195 that follows.
bos@97 196
bos@96 197 \begin{figure}[ht]
bos@96 198 \centering
bos@96 199 \grafix{tour-history}
bos@96 200 \caption{Graphical history of the \dirname{hello} repository}
bos@99 201 \label{fig:tour-basic:history}
bos@96 202 \end{figure}
bos@96 203
bos@97 204 \subsection{Changesets, revisions, and talking to other
bos@97 205 people}
bos@97 206
bos@97 207 As English is a notoriously sloppy language, and computer science has
bos@99 208 a hallowed history of terminological confusion (why use one term when
bos@99 209 four will do?), revision control has a variety of words and phrases
bos@99 210 that mean the same thing. If you are talking about Mercurial history
bos@99 211 with other people, you will find that the word ``changeset'' is often
bos@99 212 compressed to ``change'' or (when written) ``cset'', and sometimes a
bos@99 213 changeset is referred to as a ``revision'' or a ``rev''.
bos@88 214
bos@88 215 While it doesn't matter what \emph{word} you use to refer to the
bos@88 216 concept of ``a~changeset'', the \emph{identifier} that you use to
bos@88 217 refer to ``a~\emph{specific} changeset'' is of great importance.
bos@88 218 Recall that the \texttt{changeset} field in the output from
bos@88 219 \hgcmd{log} identifies a changeset using both a number and a
bos@97 220 hexadecimal string.
bos@97 221 \begin{itemize}
bos@97 222 \item The revision number is \emph{only valid in that repository},
bos@97 223 \item while the hex string is the \emph{permanent, unchanging
bos@97 224 identifier} that will always identify that exact changeset in
bos@97 225 \emph{every} copy of the repository.
bos@97 226 \end{itemize}
bos@88 227 This distinction is important. If you send someone an email talking
bos@88 228 about ``revision~33'', there's a high likelihood that their
bos@88 229 revision~33 will \emph{not be the same} as yours. The reason for this
bos@88 230 is that a revision number depends on the order in which changes
bos@88 231 arrived in a repository, and there is no guarantee that the same
bos@88 232 changes will happen in the same order in different repositories.
bos@88 233 Three changes $a,b,c$ can easily appear in one repository as $0,1,2$,
bos@88 234 while in another as $1,0,2$.
bos@88 235
bos@88 236 Mercurial uses revision numbers purely as a convenient shorthand. If
bos@88 237 you need to discuss a changeset with someone, or make a record of a
bos@88 238 changeset for some other reason (for example, in a bug report), use
bos@88 239 the hexadecimal identifier.
bos@88 240
bos@88 241 \subsection{Viewing specific revisions}
bos@88 242
bos@88 243 To narrow the output of \hgcmd{log} down to a single revision, use the
bos@91 244 \hgopt{log}{-r} (or \hgopt{log}{--rev}) option. You can use either a
bos@91 245 revision number or a long-form changeset identifier, and you can
bos@91 246 provide as many revisions as you want. \interaction{tour.log-r}
bos@88 247
bos@88 248 If you want to see the history of several revisions without having to
bos@88 249 list each one, you can use \emph{range notation}; this lets you
bos@88 250 express the idea ``I want all revisions between $a$ and $b$,
bos@88 251 inclusive''.
bos@88 252 \interaction{tour.log.range}
bos@88 253 Mercurial also honours the order in which you specify revisions, so
bos@88 254 \hgcmdargs{log}{-r 2:4} prints $2,3,4$ while \hgcmdargs{log}{-r 4:2}
bos@88 255 prints $4,3,2$.
bos@88 256
bos@91 257 \subsection{More detailed information}
bos@91 258
bos@91 259 While the summary information printed by \hgcmd{log} is useful if you
bos@91 260 already know what you're looking for, you may need to see a complete
bos@91 261 description of the change, or a list of the files changed, if you're
bos@91 262 trying to decide whether a changeset is the one you're looking for.
bos@91 263 The \hgcmd{log} command's \hggopt{-v} (or \hggopt{--verbose})
bos@91 264 option gives you this extra detail.
bos@91 265 \interaction{tour.log-v}
bos@91 266
bos@91 267 If you want to see both the description and content of a change, add
bos@91 268 the \hgopt{log}{-p} (or \hgopt{log}{--patch}) option. This displays
bos@91 269 the content of a change as a \emph{unified diff} (if you've never seen
bos@91 270 a unified diff before, see section~\ref{sec:mq:patch} for an overview).
bos@91 271 \interaction{tour.log-vp}
bos@91 272
bos@91 273 \section{All about command options}
bos@91 274
bos@91 275 Let's take a brief break from exploring Mercurial commands to discuss
bos@91 276 a pattern in the way that they work; you may find this useful to keep
steve@158 277 in mind as we continue our tour.
bos@91 278
bos@91 279 Mercurial has a consistent and straightforward approach to dealing
bos@91 280 with the options that you can pass to commands. It follows the
bos@91 281 conventions for options that are common to modern Linux and Unix
bos@91 282 systems.
bos@91 283 \begin{itemize}
bos@91 284 \item Every option has a long name. For example, as we've already
bos@91 285 seen, the \hgcmd{log} command accepts a \hgopt{log}{--rev} option.
bos@91 286 \item Most options have short names, too. Instead of
bos@91 287 \hgopt{log}{--rev}, we can use \hgopt{log}{-r}. (The reason that
bos@91 288 some options don't have short names is that the options in question
bos@91 289 are rarely used.)
bos@91 290 \item Long options start with two dashes (e.g.~\hgopt{log}{--rev}),
bos@91 291 while short options start with one (e.g.~\hgopt{log}{-r}).
bos@91 292 \item Option naming and usage is consistent across commands. For
bos@91 293 example, every command that lets you specify a changeset~ID or
bos@91 294 revision number accepts both \hgopt{log}{-r} and \hgopt{log}{--rev}
bos@91 295 arguments.
bos@91 296 \end{itemize}
bos@91 297 In the examples throughout this book, I use short options instead of
bos@91 298 long. This just reflects my own preference, so don't read anything
bos@91 299 significant into it.
bos@91 300
bos@91 301 Most commands that print output of some kind will print more output
bos@91 302 when passed a \hggopt{-v} (or \hggopt{--verbose}) option, and less
bos@91 303 when passed \hggopt{-q} (or \hggopt{--quiet}).
bos@91 304
bos@91 305 \section{Making and reviewing changes}
bos@91 306
bos@91 307 Now that we have a grasp of viewing history in Mercurial, let's take a
bos@91 308 look at making some changes and examining them.
bos@91 309
bos@91 310 The first thing we'll do is isolate our experiment in a repository of
bos@91 311 its own. We use the \hgcmd{clone} command, but we don't need to
bos@91 312 clone a copy of the remote repository. Since we already have a copy
bos@91 313 of it locally, we can just clone that instead. This is much faster
bos@91 314 than cloning over the network, and cloning a local repository uses
bos@91 315 less disk space in most cases, too.
bos@91 316 \interaction{tour.reclone}
bos@91 317 As an aside, it's often good practice to keep a ``pristine'' copy of a
bos@91 318 remote repository around, which you can then make temporary clones of
bos@91 319 to create sandboxes for each task you want to work on. This lets you
bos@91 320 work on multiple tasks in parallel, each isolated from the others
bos@91 321 until it's complete and you're ready to integrate it back. Because
bos@91 322 local clones are so cheap, there's almost no overhead to cloning and
bos@91 323 destroying repositories whenever you want.
bos@91 324
bos@91 325 In our \dirname{my-hello} repository, we have a file
bos@91 326 \filename{hello.c} that contains the classic ``hello, world'' program.
bos@91 327 Let's use the ancient and venerable \command{sed} command to edit this
bos@91 328 file so that it prints a second line of output. (I'm only using
bos@91 329 \command{sed} to do this because it's easy to write a scripted example
bos@91 330 this way. Since you're not under the same constraint, you probably
bos@91 331 won't want to use \command{sed}; simply use your preferred text editor to
bos@91 332 do the same thing.)
bos@91 333 \interaction{tour.sed}
bos@91 334
bos@91 335 Mercurial's \hgcmd{status} command will tell us what Mercurial knows
bos@91 336 about the files in the repository.
bos@91 337 \interaction{tour.status}
bos@91 338 The \hgcmd{status} command prints no output for some files, but a line
bos@91 339 starting with ``\texttt{M}'' for \filename{hello.c}. Unless you tell
bos@91 340 it to, \hgcmd{status} will not print any output for files that have
bos@91 341 not been modified.
bos@91 342
bos@91 343 The ``\texttt{M}'' indicates that Mercurial has noticed that we
bos@97 344 modified \filename{hello.c}. We didn't need to \emph{inform}
bos@97 345 Mercurial that we were going to modify the file before we started, or
bos@97 346 that we had modified the file after we were done; it was able to
bos@97 347 figure this out itself.
bos@91 348
bos@91 349 It's a little bit helpful to know that we've modified
bos@91 350 \filename{hello.c}, but we might prefer to know exactly \emph{what}
bos@91 351 changes we've made to it. To do this, we use the \hgcmd{diff}
bos@91 352 command.
bos@91 353 \interaction{tour.diff}
bos@91 354
bos@91 355 \section{Recording changes in a new changeset}
bos@91 356
bos@91 357 We can modify files, build and test our changes, and use
bos@91 358 \hgcmd{status} and \hgcmd{diff} to review our changes, until we're
bos@91 359 satisfied with what we've done and arrive at a natural stopping point
bos@91 360 where we want to record our work in a new changeset.
bos@91 361
bos@91 362 The \hgcmd{commit} command lets us create a new changeset; we'll
bos@91 363 usually refer to this as ``making a commit'' or ``committing''.
bos@91 364
bos@102 365 \subsection{Setting up a username}
bos@102 366
bos@174 367 When you try to run \hgcmd{commit} for the first time, it is not
bos@174 368 guaranteed to succeed. Mercurial records your name and address with
bos@174 369 each change that you commit, so that you and others will later be able
bos@174 370 to tell who made each change. Mercurial tries to automatically figure
bos@174 371 out a sensible username to commit the change with. It will attempt
bos@174 372 each of the following methods, in order:
bos@174 373 \begin{enumerate}
bos@174 374 \item If you specify a \hgopt{commit}{-u} option to the \hgcmd{commit}
bos@174 375 command on the command line, followed by a username, this is always
bos@174 376 given the highest precedence.
bos@174 377 \item If you have set the \envar{HGUSER} environment variable, this is
bos@174 378 checked next.
bos@174 379 \item If you create a file in your home directory called
bos@174 380 \sfilename{.hgrc}, with a \rcitem{ui}{username} entry, that will be
bos@174 381 used next. To see what the contents of this file should look like,
bos@174 382 refer to section~\ref{sec:tour-basic:username} below.
bos@174 383 \item If you have set the \envar{EMAIL} environment variable, this
bos@174 384 will be used next.
bos@174 385 \item Mercurial will query your system to find out your local user
bos@174 386 name and host name, and construct a username from these components.
bos@174 387 Since this often results in a username that is not very useful, it
bos@174 388 will print a warning if it has to do this.
bos@174 389 \end{enumerate}
bos@174 390 If all of these mechanisms fail, Mercurial will fail, printing an
bos@174 391 error message. In this case, it will not let you commit until you set
bos@174 392 up a username.
bos@174 393
bos@174 394 You should think of the \envar{HGUSER} environment variable and the
bos@174 395 \hgopt{commit}{-u} option to the \hgcmd{commit} command as ways to
bos@174 396 \emph{override} Mercurial's default selection of username. For normal
bos@174 397 use, the simplest and most robust way to set a username for yourself
bos@174 398 is by creating a \sfilename{.hgrc} file; see below for details.
bos@102 399
bos@102 400 \subsubsection{Creating a Mercurial configuration file}
bos@174 401 \label{sec:tour-basic:username}
bos@102 402
bos@102 403 To set a user name, use your favourite editor to create a file called
bos@102 404 \sfilename{.hgrc} in your home directory. Mercurial will use this
bos@102 405 file to look up your personalised configuration settings. The initial
bos@102 406 contents of your \sfilename{.hgrc} should look like this.
bos@102 407 \begin{codesample2}
bos@102 408 # This is a Mercurial configuration file.
bos@102 409 [ui]
bos@102 410 username = Firstname Lastname <email.address@domain.net>
bos@102 411 \end{codesample2}
bos@102 412 The ``\texttt{[ui]}'' line begins a \emph{section} of the config file,
bos@102 413 so you can read the ``\texttt{username = ...}'' line as meaning ``set
bos@102 414 the value of the \texttt{username} item in the \texttt{ui} section''.
bos@102 415 A section continues until a new section begins, or the end of the
bos@102 416 file. Mercurial ignores empty lines and treats any text from
bos@102 417 ``\texttt{\#}'' to the end of a line as a comment.
bos@102 418
bos@102 419 \subsubsection{Choosing a user name}
bos@102 420
bos@102 421 You can use any text you like as the value of the \texttt{username}
bos@102 422 config item, since this information is for reading by other people,
bos@102 423 but for interpreting by Mercurial. The convention that most people
bos@102 424 follow is to use their name and email address, as in the example
bos@102 425 above.
bos@102 426
bos@102 427 \begin{note}
bos@102 428 Mercurial's built-in web server obfuscates email addresses, to make
bos@102 429 it more difficult for the email harvesting tools that spammers use.
bos@102 430 This reduces the likelihood that you'll start receiving more junk
bos@102 431 email if you publish a Mercurial repository on the web.
bos@102 432 \end{note}
bos@102 433
bos@91 434 \subsection{Writing a commit message}
bos@91 435
bos@91 436 When we commit a change, Mercurial drops us into a text editor, to
bos@91 437 enter a message that will describe the modifications we've made in
bos@91 438 this changeset. This is called the \emph{commit message}. It will be
bos@91 439 a record for readers of what we did and why, and it will be printed by
bos@91 440 \hgcmd{log} after we've finished committing.
bos@91 441 \interaction{tour.commit}
bos@91 442
bos@91 443 The editor that the \hgcmd{commit} command drops us into will contain
bos@91 444 an empty line, followed by a number of lines starting with
bos@91 445 ``\texttt{HG:}''.
bos@91 446 \begin{codesample2}
bos@91 447 \emph{empty line}
bos@91 448 HG: changed hello.c
bos@91 449 \end{codesample2}
bos@91 450 Mercurial ignores the lines that start with ``\texttt{HG:}''; it uses
bos@91 451 them only to tell us which files it's recording changes to. Modifying
bos@91 452 or deleting these lines has no effect.
bos@91 453
bos@91 454 \subsection{Writing a good commit message}
bos@91 455
bos@91 456 Since \hgcmd{log} only prints the first line of a commit message by
bos@91 457 default, it's best to write a commit message whose first line stands
bos@91 458 alone. Here's a real example of a commit message that \emph{doesn't}
bos@91 459 follow this guideline, and hence has a summary that is not readable.
bos@91 460 \begin{codesample2}
bos@91 461 changeset: 73:584af0e231be
bos@91 462 user: Censored Person <censored.person@example.org>
bos@91 463 date: Tue Sep 26 21:37:07 2006 -0700
bos@91 464 summary: include buildmeister/commondefs. Add an exports and install
bos@91 465 \end{codesample2}
bos@91 466
bos@91 467 As far as the remainder of the contents of the commit message are
bos@91 468 concerned, there are no hard-and-fast rules. Mercurial itself doesn't
bos@91 469 interpret or care about the contents of the commit message, though
bos@91 470 your project may have policies that dictate a certain kind of
bos@91 471 formatting.
bos@91 472
bos@91 473 My personal preference is for short, but informative, commit messages
bos@91 474 that tell me something that I can't figure out with a quick glance at
bos@91 475 the output of \hgcmdargs{log}{--patch}.
bos@91 476
bos@91 477 \subsection{Aborting a commit}
bos@91 478
bos@91 479 If you decide that you don't want to commit while in the middle of
bos@91 480 editing a commit message, simply exit from your editor without saving
bos@91 481 the file that it's editing. This will cause nothing to happen to
bos@91 482 either the repository or the working directory.
bos@91 483
bos@91 484 If we run the \hgcmd{commit} command without any arguments, it records
bos@91 485 all of the changes we've made, as reported by \hgcmd{status} and
bos@91 486 \hgcmd{diff}.
bos@91 487
bos@102 488 \subsection{Admiring our new handiwork}
bos@91 489
bos@91 490 Once we've finished the commit, we can use the \hgcmd{tip} command to
bos@91 491 display the changeset we just created. This command produces output
bos@91 492 that is identical to \hgcmd{log}, but it only displays the newest
bos@91 493 revision in the repository.
bos@91 494 \interaction{tour.tip}
bos@91 495 We refer to the newest revision in the repository as the tip revision,
bos@91 496 or simply the tip.
bos@91 497
bos@91 498 \section{Sharing changes}
bos@91 499
bos@91 500 We mentioned earlier that repositories in Mercurial are
bos@91 501 self-contained. This means that the changeset we just created exists
bos@91 502 only in our \dirname{my-hello} repository. Let's look at a few ways
bos@91 503 that we can propagate this change into other repositories.
bos@91 504
bos@91 505 \subsection{Pulling changes from another repository}
bos@91 506 \label{sec:tour:pull}
bos@91 507
bos@91 508 To get started, let's clone our original \dirname{hello} repository,
bos@91 509 which does not contain the change we just committed. We'll call our
bos@91 510 temporary repository \dirname{hello-pull}.
bos@91 511 \interaction{tour.clone-pull}
bos@91 512
bos@91 513 We'll use the \hgcmd{pull} command to bring changes from
bos@91 514 \dirname{my-hello} into \dirname{hello-pull}. However, blindly
bos@91 515 pulling unknown changes into a repository is a somewhat scary
bos@91 516 prospect. Mercurial provides the \hgcmd{incoming} command to tell us
bos@91 517 what changes the \hgcmd{pull} command \emph{would} pull into the
bos@91 518 repository, without actually pulling the changes in.
bos@91 519 \interaction{tour.incoming}
bos@91 520 (Of course, someone could cause more changesets to appear in the
bos@91 521 repository that we ran \hgcmd{incoming} in, before we get a chance to
bos@91 522 \hgcmd{pull} the changes, so that we could end up pulling changes that we
bos@91 523 didn't expect.)
bos@91 524
bos@91 525 Bringing changes into a repository is a simple matter of running the
bos@91 526 \hgcmd{pull} command, and telling it which repository to pull from.
bos@91 527 \interaction{tour.pull}
bos@91 528 As you can see from the before-and-after output of \hgcmd{tip}, we
bos@91 529 have successfully pulled changes into our repository. There remains
bos@92 530 one step before we can see these changes in the working directory.
bos@92 531
bos@92 532 \subsection{Updating the working directory}
bos@92 533
bos@92 534 We have so far glossed over the relationship between a repository and
bos@91 535 its working directory. The \hgcmd{pull} command that we ran in
bos@91 536 section~\ref{sec:tour:pull} brought changes into the repository, but
bos@91 537 if we check, there's no sign of those changes in the working
bos@91 538 directory. This is because \hgcmd{pull} does not (by default) touch
bos@91 539 the working directory. Instead, we use the \hgcmd{update} command to
bos@91 540 do this.
bos@91 541 \interaction{tour.update}
bos@91 542
bos@91 543 It might seem a bit strange that \hgcmd{pull} doesn't update the
bos@91 544 working directory automatically. There's actually a good reason for
bos@91 545 this: you can use \hgcmd{update} to update the working directory to
bos@91 546 the state it was in at \emph{any revision} in the history of the
bos@91 547 repository. If you had the working directory updated to an old
bos@91 548 revision---to hunt down the origin of a bug, say---and ran a
bos@91 549 \hgcmd{pull} which automatically updated the working directory to a
bos@91 550 new revision, you might not be terribly happy.
bos@91 551
bos@91 552 However, since pull-then-update is such a common thing to do,
bos@91 553 Mercurial lets you combine the two by passing the \hgopt{pull}{-u}
bos@91 554 option to \hgcmd{pull}.
bos@91 555 \begin{codesample2}
bos@91 556 hg pull -u
bos@91 557 \end{codesample2}
bos@92 558 If you look back at the output of \hgcmd{pull} in
bos@92 559 section~\ref{sec:tour:pull} when we ran it without \hgopt{pull}{-u},
bos@92 560 you can see that it printed a helpful reminder that we'd have to take
bos@92 561 an explicit step to update the working directory:
bos@92 562 \begin{codesample2}
bos@92 563 (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
bos@92 564 \end{codesample2}
bos@91 565
bos@91 566 To find out what revision the working directory is at, use the
bos@91 567 \hgcmd{parents} command.
bos@91 568 \interaction{tour.parents}
bos@101 569 If you look back at figure~\ref{fig:tour-basic:history}, you'll see
bos@101 570 arrows connecting each changeset. The node that the arrow leads
bos@101 571 \emph{from} in each case is a parent, and the node that the arrow
bos@101 572 leads \emph{to} is its child. The working directory has a parent in
bos@101 573 just the same way; this is the changeset that the working directory
bos@101 574 currently contains.
bos@101 575
bos@91 576 To update the working directory to a particular revision, give a
bos@91 577 revision number or changeset~ID to the \hgcmd{update} command.
bos@91 578 \interaction{tour.older}
bos@91 579 If you omit an explicit revision, \hgcmd{update} will update to the
bos@94 580 tip revision, as shown by the second call to \hgcmd{update} in the
bos@94 581 example above.
bos@91 582
bos@92 583 \subsection{Pushing changes to another repository}
bos@92 584
bos@92 585 Mercurial lets us push changes to another repository, from the
bos@92 586 repository we're currently visiting. As with the example of
bos@92 587 \hgcmd{pull} above, we'll create a temporary repository to push our
bos@92 588 changes into.
bos@92 589 \interaction{tour.clone-push}
bos@92 590 The \hgcmd{outgoing} command tells us what changes would be pushed
bos@92 591 into another repository.
bos@92 592 \interaction{tour.outgoing}
bos@92 593 And the \hgcmd{push} command does the actual push.
bos@92 594 \interaction{tour.push}
bos@92 595 As with \hgcmd{pull}, the \hgcmd{push} command does not update the
bos@92 596 working directory in the repository that it's pushing changes into.
bos@92 597 (Unlike \hgcmd{pull}, \hgcmd{push} does not provide a \texttt{-u}
bos@92 598 option that updates the other repository's working directory.)
bos@92 599
bos@92 600 What happens if we try to pull or push changes and the receiving
bos@92 601 repository already has those changes? Nothing too exciting.
bos@92 602 \interaction{tour.push.nothing}
bos@92 603
bos@93 604 \subsection{Sharing changes over a network}
bos@93 605
bos@93 606 The commands we have covered in the previous few sections are not
bos@93 607 limited to working with local repositories. Each works in exactly the
bos@93 608 same fashion over a network connection; simply pass in a URL instead
bos@93 609 of a local path.
bos@93 610 \interaction{tour.outgoing.net}
bos@93 611 In this example, we can see what changes we could push to the remote
bos@93 612 repository, but the repository is understandably not set up to let
bos@93 613 anonymous users push to it.
bos@93 614 \interaction{tour.push.net}
bos@93 615
bos@84 616 %%% Local Variables:
bos@84 617 %%% mode: latex
bos@84 618 %%% TeX-master: "00book"
bos@84 619 %%% End: